Polyurethane VS Slurry (Mudjacking)

·      Smaller hole (5/8” even 3/8”) compared to 1 ¼” or bigger.

·      Able to drive over when job is finished. Not with slurry (MudJacking).

·      While the slurry used in mudjacking may wash away or deteriorate over time, especially in harsh weather conditions, polyurethane foam remains intact and offers a long-lasting solution.

·      Polyurethane is lightweight and takes fewer drill holes

·      Polyurethane expands and pushes water out of damaged area.

·      Polyurethane is being promoted by engineers and the railway as approved methods or raising and stabilizing the ground mudjacking is not.

·      Polyurethane only weighs 2lbs to 4 lbs per cubic foot vs 100lbs a cubic foot with mudjacking, causeing less damage to the environment.

·      Polyurethane can be used for many uses that mudjacking cannot, including seawalls, underwater scenarios and more.